A gaggle of bigoted municipal lawmakers have become unlikely—but effective—poster children for electoral reform.

The January 6 committee saves its greatest surprise for last, voting unanimously to subpoena Donald Trump.

Law professor Amy Kapczynski on why progressives need to move from a defensive position to a positive vision for the highest court in the country

Andy Warhol’s latest 15 minutes of fame came during oral arguments in a case that may determine the future of “fair use” transformations.

A pair of death penalty decisions reaffirms a sad fact about the high court: There is a majority of justices who want to keep the executions coming.

Clarence Thomas sat silent for years before he said a word. The court’s newest justice came out swinging at her first hearing.

The rave reviews that the newest Supreme Court justice received on her debut were well deserved, but they’ve created a set of outsize expectations that she can never fulfill.

If the Mar-a-Lago affair has taught us anything, it’s that as long as Trump-appointed judges exist, all bets are off.

A recent spat between a judge and Yale Law School forces us to consider whether the federal judiciary should continue to be a spoils system for the well connected.

Percoco v. United States would seem to be a pretty clear-cut case of political bribery. That the justices are even willing to hear it is a bad sign.

The Supreme Court is going to get a crack at Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act—and the internet may never be the same.

The high court is set to hear two major cases that could allow the conservative majority to redefine the Equal Protection Clause.

A rather odd plaintiff—with some convoluted legal arguments—has emerged to sue the administration over its loan forgiveness proposal.

Right-wing judicial hegemony presents a daunting challenge for liberal leaders—but not an insurmountable one.

Americans’ antipathy toward the high court is deepening—and for the first time, a slim majority favors expansion.

With the former president facing accountability on multiple fronts, how desperate—and dangerous—is he going to become?

The massive civil suit launched by New York Attorney General Tish James describes the former president’s family business as a nesting doll of financial chicanery.

House Democrats on Wednesday passed their reform of the Electoral Count Act. The Senate has a different reform bill in mind. Only one can win.

The former president’s hoarding of classified documents is the least complicated of his scandals—and it’s also proving the hardest to dodge.

He cites a constitutional clause that should shield him from questioning. But he has the history and the precedent wrong.