Reproductive rights in America have been brought to the brink thanks to decades of lies and complacency.

Wednesday’s oral arguments in a challenge of Mississippi’s abortion law reveal that a majority of justices want to gut abortion rights in America.

As the Supreme Court considers Texas’s extreme abortion ban, commentators would have you believe Mississippi’s is comparatively reasonable.

The court’s conservative majority will likely soon scuttle abortion rights, but they don’t seem inclined to let S.B. 8 be the means of destruction.

What will be left of abortion rights after the next few months of consequential cases is anybody’s guess.

Heather Booth and the Jane Collective helped thousands of people have abortions before Roe. Their example is once again relevant.

From the way it entered the Union, right up through this week, the Lone Star State has been aggressively dragging the country backward.

The plaintiffs in the next big abortion rights case quietly—and ominously—flipped their script to better suit the ideology of the new justice.

Don’t be fooled by the burst of moderation from the justices this term.

In 2011, the first “fetal heartbeat” bill was introduced in Ohio. The tactic was seen as too extreme to ban abortion effectively, but a decade later it may pay off.

The Supreme Court’s most recent additions, like their conservative brethren, are no friends to abortion rights.

People “saw what the governor and state legislature were trying to do, and it made people realize the importance of the funds,” one organizer said of the assault on reproductive rights.

The anti-abortion gathering isn’t “canceled,” its organizers announced—it’s going “virtual.”

The meme-ification of the justice was just one part of the brand-driven, girl-bossed, leaned-in conception of women’s freedom in which it incubated.

The chief justice threads a judicial needle and hands the conservative legal movement another disappointing ruling.

“I remember one woman who arrived and asked, ‘Is this the clinic?’ And we were like, ‘What clinic?’”

The high court’s taken a dim view of targeted regulation of abortion providers in the past, but that was before Brett Kavanaugh.

A new book warns that even with Roe v. Wade intact, the procedure is still effectively banned in some places.

Ireland's abortion ban has been in place for decades. But a new experiment in direct democracy might change that.