The head of the Brennan Center for Law and Justice has a new book—and a lot of thoughts on these upcoming, controversial court decisions.

The conservative justice helped the tribes win while also speaking to future jurisprudence.

In a stunning ruling, the Supreme Court has rejected a challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act.

Campus diversity isn’t the only reason to keep the policy in place.

Conservatives have been trying to stop efforts to protect abortion rights with a confusingly worded ballot.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined with the court’s liberals, but would they do it again?

The court’s decision affects congressional district maps across the country, and a few Republicans are in big trouble.

The 5–4 decision ruled in favor of Black voters.

Thankfully, this is about the First Amendment, not the former president’s manhood.

It isn’t a coincidence. The court is corrupt, both judicially and ethically, because of the extreme ideology six of its justices serve.

Justice Samuel Alito is inventing a new way for the high court to substitute its own judgment for that of lawmakers.

Buoyed by the right-wing Supreme Court, Christian groups are laying the groundwork for public schools to veer back toward the 1960s.

Lawmakers might once again forestall a debt default, but not without teaching the GOP that they can get away with holding the economy hostage.

A case involving the EPA’s protection of wetlands somehow became a forum for some fiery justice-on-justice warfare over textualism.

The conservative court just made it easier for corporations to pollute our bodies of water.

The chief justice says you don’t need to be worried about the Supreme Court’s ethics. They’ll handle it themselves.

An organization representing government workers is making a preemptive strike against the mounting default crisis.

And it’s entirely possible if he becomes president.

The justice’s vision of the judiciary’s role in public health may be more dangerous than any Covid-era restriction.

The high court’s ruling on the nature of “transformative” works of art could have major ramifications for artists working today—as well as the A.I. enthusiasts looking toward tomorrow.