Tuesday’s leaked draft decision is a fearsome template for overturning a slew of rulings that have shaped American life for decades.

The high court’s ruling in a 2020 case upended Oklahoma’s relationship with Indian country. Now the justices are considering an even bigger step.

The party has made a habit of “judge-shopping” in the Northern District of Texas, and there’s no mystery why.

A radical reimagining of the Constitution, dismissed by legal scholars as “rubbish,” may have found a receptive audience in the Supreme Court.

Long before the 6–3 court hands down rulings, the cases it chooses to hear have a tidal effect on the nation’s ideological drift.

How will the law work in a world where the high court is making up the rules as it goes along?

Neil Gorsuch’s recent invocation of the “major questions doctrine” has ominous implications for anyone not keen on watching the government drown in dysfunction.

The court did not foreclose robust new workplace vaccination standards, nor bless the radical right’s blueprint for annihilating the “administrative state.”

The high court struck down OSHA’s testing mandate but left a vaccine requirement for health care workers in place.

The chief justice’s veiled end-of-year remarks seem to indicate that if the high court cannot reform itself, reform will be forced upon it.

The country we’ll reside in at the start of 2022 will look very different in 365 days’ time.

The high court’s decision in the matter of the Lone Star State’s controversial abortion law seems destined to spawn further chaos.

A revealing exchange between Fox News host Laura Ingraham and the Texas senator offers a window into the ways the right views the high court.

Reproductive rights in America have been brought to the brink thanks to decades of lies and complacency.

Wednesday’s oral arguments in a challenge of Mississippi’s abortion law reveal that a majority of justices want to gut abortion rights in America.

This week, the high court will take up the matter of Chevron deference—the judicial doctrine that currently allows the executive branch to function.

The Supreme Court’s 6–3 tilt is inspiring right-wing judicial actors to take legal moon shots they wouldn’t have dared to attempt not long ago.

The high court’s unusually generous predisposition to faith-based claims takes a back seat to Samuel Alito’s determination to end the “guerrilla war on the death penalty.”

The court’s conservative majority has targeted the EPA with a tradition-smashing move that could imperil the administrative state.

The high court will decide whether the First Amendment prevents elected bodies from disciplining their own members.